Legal City(TM) :: Your Online LEGAL Partner(TM)
G17 Pinewood Square, Pinewood Office Park, 33 Riley Rd, Woodmead, 2191
P O Box 1426, Gallo Manor, 2052 • E-Mail. info@legalcity.net Telephone. 086 11 78378 • Fax. 086 648 7683
This document has been provided courtesy of Legal City - www.legalcity.net
General Disclaimer: The content of Legal City does not constitute legal, tax or financial advice, nor does it necessarily reflect the views of our management, staff, shareholders, associates, contributors, authors or suppliers. Even though every endeavour has been made to ensure the accuracy of this information we cannot be held responsible for any errors and/or omissions. By using this web site you agree to accept and abide by our terms and conditions. The web site and all its content is copyright © 2000-2010, Legal City CC • This page printed on September 7, 2010 at 9:14:23 pm, SA Standard Time.
Legal City :: Your Online LEGAL Partner

Legal Magazine

Terms and Conditions were
last updated on 3 Aug 2008
qPortal Content Management

Legal Magazine

Return to Home Select the Author's Name for more
Disclosure of past misconduct at previous employer
Published July 29, 2010
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rated 71% by 7 readers
Low Click above to Rate High

Often an employee, who has been charged with misconduct and was found guilty and subsequently was dismissed, will wittingly or unwittingly fail to inform their new employer that their services were terminated due to misconduct. This is also often the case when an employee resigns in the face of a disciplinary hearing for alleged misconduct to avoid a possible adverse outcome of a disciplinary hearing that may or may not taint their new employment relationship.

The question that arises is whether an employee who was dismissed for misconduct must disclose this to their new employer. Also, if they fail to do so and the new employer finds out, whether the employer is entitled to discipline them.

The courts have taken the view that an employer is entitled to discipline and dismiss an employee who has misrepresented material information about their past employment and or failed to disclose material facts relating to past employment before appointment. Especially if the employee is employed at a senior level and occupies a high profile job position when the nature of the work requires disclosure.

In Auret v Eskom Pension and Provident Fund [1996] 7BLLR 838 (IC), the Industrial Court found that an employer was entitled to terminate an employee's employment if there are material misrepresentations regarding the employee's past employment. The court further found that failure to disclose criminal activities in previous employment constitutes a dismissible offence.

In Ndlovu v Transnet Ltd t/a Portnet (1997) 18 ILJ 1031 (LC) an employee was dismissed from her previous employer. A criminal charge of fraud was laid against her by her previous employer and she was subsequently arrested. Her current employer then charged her with intentional non-disclosure, because she failed to disclose during her interview that she had been dismissed due to dishonesty by her previous employer.

In the case of Ndlovu the Labour Court held that it was not inappropriate for the employee's current employer to ask about her previous conduct, because the employee was employed at a senior level and enjoyed a high profile position.

In Oracle Corporation SA (Pty) Ltd v CCMA and Others [2005] 10 BLLR 982 (LC), the employee omitted from his CV the fact that he was employed at a company which was taken over as a going concern by his current employer. The court found that not disclosing material facts regarding past employment to your new employer is a dismissible offence.

It is always in the best interest of an employee, who is commencing employment with a new employer, to disclose the reasons for the termination of their services by their previous employer to avoid disciplinary action by their current employer for their failure to disclose material facts about their past employer, either through misrepresentation or by omission.

This duty to disclose is even more obligatory in instances where an employer has specifically asked an employee for the reasons for leaving their previous employment.

 

Disclaimer :: Legal Magazine
Although the content of the articles published in this magazine have been checked for accuracy, it is important to remember that laws and government policies are constantly changing and accordingly we take no responsibility for the accuracy or currency of the information provided herein. If you require particular information you are advised to consult with the article's author or a qualified legal authority.
PLEASE SIGN IN
 USERNAME:
 PASSWORD:
 
GET OUR NEWSLETTER
 YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:
 
  FRAUD PREVENTION
  WE ARE TRACKING YOU
General Disclaimer: The content of Legal City does not constitute legal, tax or financial advice, nor does it necessarily reflect the views of our management, staff, shareholders, associates, contributors, authors or suppliers. Even though every endeavour has been made to ensure the accuracy of this information we cannot be held responsible for any errors and/or omissions. By using this web site you agree to accept and abide by our terms and conditions.
This web site and all its content is copyright © 2000-2010, Legal City CC • Web site managed with qPortal Content Management v 4.0.0 • This page loaded on September 7, 2010 at 9:14:23 pm, SA Standard Time.