Legal City(TM) :: Your Online LEGAL Partner(TM)
G17 Pinewood Square, Pinewood Office Park, 33 Riley Rd, Woodmead, 2191
P O Box 1426, Gallo Manor, 2052 • E-Mail. info@legalcity.net Telephone. 086 11 78378 • Fax. 086 648 7683
This document has been provided courtesy of Legal City - www.legalcity.net
General Disclaimer: The content of Legal City does not constitute legal, tax or financial advice, nor does it necessarily reflect the views of our management, staff, shareholders, associates, contributors, authors or suppliers. Even though every endeavour has been made to ensure the accuracy of this information we cannot be held responsible for any errors and/or omissions. By using this web site you agree to accept and abide by our terms and conditions. The web site and all its content is copyright © 2000-2010, Legal City CC • This page printed on September 7, 2010 at 11:31:21 pm, SA Standard Time.
Legal City :: Your Online LEGAL Partner

Legal Magazine

Terms and Conditions were
last updated on 3 Aug 2008
qPortal Content Management

Legal Magazine

Return to Home Select the Author's Name for more
Insurance coverage relating to product liabilty in South Africa
Published July 29, 2010
Tony Canny
Eversheds
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rated 60% by 7 readers
Low Click above to Rate High

During October 2010 the South African Consumer Protection Act (CPA) will come into force and effect. That will dramatically change the current position in South Africa relating to product liability, as consumers will be able to exercise their rights under the no-fault product liability provisions of the CPA.

Consumers will be able to consider and choose whether or not to sue the producer, importer, distributor or retailer of the relevant goods.

Currently the consumer has to prove negligence, or other fault on the part of (generally speaking) the retailer, before being able to be successful with a product liability claim.
In addition, the consumer has to prove a causal link between the defective goods and the harm suffered.

There are provisions of the CPA which allow for class actions and also allow for consumer protection groups to become involved.

Unlike in, for example, the United States of America (USA), South African common law has not recognised class actions. That changed when South Africa became a constitutional democracy. The Constitution provides for class actions where constitutional rights have been infringed. However, the Constitution does not provide for class actions against relating to product liability.
The CPA provides the South African courts with the authority to award proved damages against the supplier for collective injury to all, or a class of consumers generally.

The CPA provides that the courts must develop the South African common law, with a view to improving the realisation and enjoyment of consumer rights generally.
According to South African common law, contingency fees are unlawful. However, since the advent of the so-called "new South Africa" during the 1990s, there has been an increase in respect of contingency fees. That, together with the CPA, will, in all probability, result in a significant increase in product liability litigation, once the CPA comes into force and effect during October 2010.

The end result is that it is probable that product liability claims will increase significantly in South Africa from October 2010 onwards as a result of the following:

All of the above needs to be carefully and thoroughly considered by everyone involved in providing insurance coverage to producers, importers, distributors and retailers in South Africa, as the risks that they will be facing from October 2010 onwards, when the CPA comes into force and effect, will increase significantly.

• No-fault product liability in terms of the CPA;
• The consumer being legally entitled to claim against the producer, importer, distributor or retailer;
• The ability to institute class actions;
• The advent of consumer protection groups; and
• The increasing use of contingency fee arrangements.

No longer will the consumer be facing the significant hurdles that he has faced before in respect of product liability claims. Furthermore, unlike in the past, the consumer is likely to not only look at suing the entity that he purchased the goods from, but rather everyone involved in the "chain", commencing with the producer of the goods and ending with the supplier thereof.

Everyone involved in the insurance industry in South Africa, starting with the broker and ending with the underwriters, need to fully comprehend the abovementioned increased risks in South Africa in order to be able to, inter alia, ensure that adequate insurance coverage is provided to the insured and that the premium charged for such coverage is sufficient, taking into account the significantly increased risks.
 

Disclaimer :: Legal Magazine
Although the content of the articles published in this magazine have been checked for accuracy, it is important to remember that laws and government policies are constantly changing and accordingly we take no responsibility for the accuracy or currency of the information provided herein. If you require particular information you are advised to consult with the article's author or a qualified legal authority.
PLEASE SIGN IN
 USERNAME:
 PASSWORD:
 
GET OUR NEWSLETTER
 YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:
 
  FRAUD PREVENTION
  WE ARE TRACKING YOU
General Disclaimer: The content of Legal City does not constitute legal, tax or financial advice, nor does it necessarily reflect the views of our management, staff, shareholders, associates, contributors, authors or suppliers. Even though every endeavour has been made to ensure the accuracy of this information we cannot be held responsible for any errors and/or omissions. By using this web site you agree to accept and abide by our terms and conditions.
This web site and all its content is copyright © 2000-2010, Legal City CC • Web site managed with qPortal Content Management v 4.0.0 • This page loaded on September 7, 2010 at 11:31:21 pm, SA Standard Time.