Legal City(TM) :: Your Online LEGAL Partner(TM)
2nd Floor, North Block, Bradenham Hall, 7 Mellis Road, Rivonia, 2128
P O Box 837, Gallo Manor, 2052 • E-Mail. info@legalcity.net Telephone. 086 11 78378 • Fax. 086 648 7683
This document has been provided courtesy of Legal City - www.legalcity.net
General Disclaimer: The content of Legal City does not constitute legal, tax or financial advice, nor does it necessarily reflect the views of our management, staff, shareholders, associates, contributors, authors or suppliers. Even though every endeavour has been made to ensure the accuracy of this information we cannot be held responsible for any errors and/or omissions. By using this web site you agree to accept and abide by our terms and conditions. The web site and all its content is copyright © 2000-2013, Legal City CC • This page printed on May 22, 2013 at 2:13:51 am, SA Standard Time.
Legal City :: Your Online LEGAL Partner

Discussion Forums
Terms and Conditions were
last updated on 3 Aug 2008
qPortal Content Management

View Topic

Return to Topics
Please Note: You need to sign in to post a reply to this topic.
Retirement while married in Community Of Property
Wednesday
May 18, 2011
5:29 PM
Posts: 1
 I got married in the early seventies, divorced in the late eigties.Part of my claim was a retirement policy, which my husband didn't pay any more - it was made paid-up. We remarried each other again In community of Property. I still have the policy document with me. We are living apart now for a year and I asked him to let the policy pay out, because he doesn't support me in any way. It seems as if he took all the money for himself now. I think I am entitled to half of that money (R65000, Which is not much) Can you tell me what my rights are? I will have to get it fast if I even get some of that now, because he will live it out as fast as possible.
Friday
July 29, 2011
2:52 PM
Posts: 4
 Outright if the policy you are referring to forms part of your second marriage then you definitely have a share provided if he was the only contracting party this might bring about a different situation as most contracting parties to insurance polices normally have the absolute right to nominate beneficiaries of such policies, which can include themselves.By virtue of the fact that he was able to claim out from the insurer, means you were not party to that insurence.however i suggest that you consult for more clarification.
Wednesday
November 23, 2011
7:34 AM
Posts: 14
 Good morning,

I agree with twalot, consult with an attorney in this matter to discuss potential legal action.

Regards
Disclaimer :: Discussion Forums
The contents of these Discussion Forums are not edited or reviewed by Legal City and, accordingly, we do not endorse nor take no responsibility for any information or advice that you may find within. If you have a particularly difficult problem you are advised to consult a qualified legal authority. Please contact us immediately should you deem any of the entries to be misleading, inaccurate or offensive.
PLEASE SIGN IN
 USERNAME:
 PASSWORD:
 
GET OUR NEWSLETTER
 YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:
 
  FRAUD PREVENTION
  WE ARE TRACKING YOU
> Read More Show Details
General Disclaimer: The content of Legal City does not constitute legal, tax or financial advice, nor does it necessarily reflect the views of our management, staff, shareholders, associates, contributors, authors or suppliers. Even though every endeavour has been made to ensure the accuracy of this information we cannot be held responsible for any errors and/or omissions. By using this web site you agree to accept and abide by our terms and conditions.
This web site and all its content is copyright © 2000-2013, Legal City CC • Web site managed with qPortal Content Management v 4.0.0 • This page loaded on May 22, 2013 at 2:13:51 am, SA Standard Time.